{
  "id": 8576207,
  "name": "CHARLES A. COPPLE v. DUNCAN TALMADGE WARNER, JR. and JERRY WAYNE WEST",
  "name_abbreviation": "Copple v. Warner",
  "decision_date": "1963-12-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "731",
  "last_page": "732",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "260 N.C. 731"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 158,
    "char_count": 1879,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.363,
    "sha256": "cadf765e8bdbd5c663165adaf36c348bf8664e96af5d4188f0d1c14bdcf39a10",
    "simhash": "1:4730b70cb201a862",
    "word_count": 291
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:49:29.885963+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CHARLES A. COPPLE v. DUNCAN TALMADGE WARNER, JR. and JERRY WAYNE WEST."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cukiam.\nReference is made to the opinion filed simultaneously herewith in the separate action by Mittie Mae Copp-le, wife of the present plaintiff, against the same defendants, ante, 727.\nThe allegations on which plaintiff \u00a1seeks to recover \u00a1herein and .those on which this wife seeks to recover in her said separate action .are identical. Too, the \u00a1demurrers filed .and the orders entered in each of the two actions are \u00a1identical. Hence, the orders \u00a1herein sustaining the demurrers \u00a1and dismissing .the action are vacated; and the cause is remanded ifior the entry \u00a1of orders as 'directed in our opinion in- the Mittie Mae Copple case.\nAs we construe \u00a1his complaint, plaintiff seeks to recover solely for personal injuries and damage to his ear pnoximately caused by the second collision. Plaintiff -alleges West \u00a1drove his car across -the center line \u00a1and \u00a1collided with the Coppl-e and Warner \u00a1oars, \u201cinjuring the plaintiff -and damaging his automobile \u00a1ais \u00a1hereinafter set forth.\u201d Whether plaintiff has a separate cause of .action against Warner for damages, if any, proxiimately caused by the first collision, is not presented.\nError and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cukiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Harold T. Dodge for plaintiff appellant.",
      "\u2018 Sanders <& Holt for defendant appellee Warner.",
      "Thomas D. Cooper for defendant appellee West.."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CHARLES A. COPPLE v. DUNCAN TALMADGE WARNER, JR. and JERRY WAYNE WEST.\n(Filed 19 December 1963.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Latham, Special Judge, July 1963 Regular Session of Alamance.\nIn plaintiff\u2019s action to recover damages from defendants, jointly and severally, for personal injuries \u00a1and .property damage he allegedly sustained on account of their j oint and concurrent negligence, the court, ini separate orders, sustained the separate demurrer of each defendant to the complaiaifc and as to such dcfendaut dismissed the action. Plaintiff excepted to\u25a0 each \u00a1order and appealed.\nHarold T. Dodge for plaintiff appellant.\n\u2018 Sanders <& Holt for defendant appellee Warner.\nThomas D. Cooper for defendant appellee West.."
  },
  "file_name": "0731-01",
  "first_page_order": 771,
  "last_page_order": 772
}