{
  "id": 8574957,
  "name": "WILLIE MAE GIBBS v. LILLIAN JONES, Administratrix of the Estate of PENNIE EDWARDS, Deceased",
  "name_abbreviation": "Gibbs v. Jones",
  "decision_date": "1964-04-08",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "610",
  "last_page": "611",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "261 N.C. 610"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "260 N.C. 291",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8574236
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/260/0291-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "132 S.E. 2d 620",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "260 N.C. 291",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8574236
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/260/0291-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 247,
    "char_count": 3018,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.554,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.380125665320789e-08,
      "percentile": 0.39453458483486875
    },
    "sha256": "1446512acef4a7f5185e7b989d18c780c65082f2779ce6de1b938137ce1ee669",
    "simhash": "1:7d36b271e415905a",
    "word_count": 519
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:53:45.776989+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WILLIE MAE GIBBS v. LILLIAN JONES, Administratrix of the Estate of PENNIE EDWARDS, Deceased."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nPlaintiff\u2019s evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to her, was sufficient to take this case to the jury under the rules set out in Johnson v. Sanders, 260 N.C. 291, 132 S.E. 2d 620.\nReversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Fred W. Harrison for plaintiff appellant.",
      "Walter G. Sheppard for defendant appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WILLIE MAE GIBBS v. LILLIAN JONES, Administratrix of the Estate of PENNIE EDWARDS, Deceased.\n(Filed 8 April, 1964.)\nExecutors and Administrators \u00a7 24a\u2014\nIn this action to recover for personal services rendered decedent the evidence is hel\u00e9 sufficient to be submitted to the jury under authority of Johnson v. Sanders, 260 N.C. 291.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Cowper, J., October Civil Session of GeeeNB.\nCivil action to recover for personal services rendered a decedent. Plaintiff was the illegitimate daughter of Joe Edwards. When she was less than a year old her mother \u201cgave her\u201d to Joe and his wife, Pennie Edwards, the defendant\u2019s intestate. Joe and Pennie never had any children and they reared plaintiff as if she were their own. After her marriage in 1954, plaintiff and her husband lived intermittently with Joe and Pennie. In the fall of 1956 they moved into a house owned by Joe just across the highway from his residence. Joe died on May 7, 1958. The small farm which he and Pennie had owned as tenants by the en-tireties then became hers by survivorship. Pennie died on January 8, 1960 at the age of fifty-four.\nPlaintiff alleged that for five years prior to the death of Pennie Edwards she rendered valuable services both to Pennie and Joe upon their promise to will all of their real and personal property to her and her infant son; that each failed to execute a will; and that she is entitled to compensation in the principal sum of $7,480.00 from the estate of Pennie Edwards.\nOn the trial, plaintiff sought to recover only for services rendered Pennie after the death of Joe. Her evidence tended to establish the following facts: Plaintiff performed services for Pennie before and after the death of Joe. On numerous occasions after his death, Pennie told plaintiff in the presence of others that she wanted her to have the house and lot on which she was then living and that she wanted plaintiff\u2019s son to have another house. After Joe died, Pennie usually came across the road to have breakfast with plaintiff who, as soon as she had finished her own, would go over and do Pennie\u2019s housework. Each day plaintiff cooked, cleaned, washed and ironed for Pennie, fed her pigs, and chased them when they got out. On clear days, she swept her yard. She also worked for her in .the field and in the garden and \u201cpulled wood out of the woods to cook with.\u201d The services which plaintiff rendered to Pennie Edwards after the death of Joe were reasonably worth fifteen to twenty dollars a week. Pennie\u2019s nearest relatives were brothers and sisters whom she seldom, if ever, saw.\nAt the close of plaintiff\u2019s evidence, defendant\u2019s motion for nonsuit was allowed. From a judgment dismissing the action plaintiff appealed.\nFred W. Harrison for plaintiff appellant.\nWalter G. Sheppard for defendant appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0610-01",
  "first_page_order": 650,
  "last_page_order": 651
}