{
  "id": 8575003,
  "name": "STATE v. PAUL HINSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Hinson",
  "decision_date": "1964-04-08",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "614",
  "last_page": "615",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "261 N.C. 614"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 113,
    "char_count": 1405,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.568,
    "sha256": "982797877348d2d8477e3d93ac69a0813ae8d63b19455d2b70319676620189a3",
    "simhash": "1:1b1fe770426a1a5a",
    "word_count": 217
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:53:45.776989+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. PAUL HINSON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nWe find no evidence sufficient to support a finding that defendant obtained money from Dixon by means of a representation that he (defendant) \u201cwas a field representative of the Prudential Life Insurance Co. with authority to make loans for said company.\u201d Indeed, the evidence was not sufficient to support a finding that defendant made such representation to Dixon. Moreover, if such representation were made, the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that it was false. The Attorney General concedes, and we agree, that the evidence does not support the indictment and that defendant\u2019s motion to dismiss as of nonsuit should have been allowed.\nReversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Sanders for the State.",
      "Melvin H. Burke for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. PAUL HINSON.\n(Filed 8 April, 1964.)\nAppeal by- defendant from Hobgood, J., October 1963 Criminal Session Of PERSON.\nCriminal prosecution on indictment based on G.S. 14-100 charging that defendant falsely, fraudulently and feloniously represented to one Lonzy Dixon that he (defendant) \u201cwas a field representative of the Prudential Life Insurance Co. with authority to make loans for said company\u201d and by means of said false pretense obtained from Dixon the sum of $2,397.20. The jury returned a verdict of guilty. Judgment, imposing a prison sentence, was pronounced. Defendant excepted and appealed.\nAttorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Sanders for the State.\nMelvin H. Burke for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0614-01",
  "first_page_order": 654,
  "last_page_order": 655
}