{
  "id": 8568904,
  "name": "ANN THOMAS DAWSON v. ROBERT WAYNE DAWSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dawson v. Dawson",
  "decision_date": "1964-09-23",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "494",
  "last_page": "495",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "262 N.C. 494"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1361,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.553,
    "sha256": "8cf959b2e68f9ac0a1d3aa7b50668b261f189220298c8b7529d724d14e8680e7",
    "simhash": "1:d24a8988861584fc",
    "word_count": 218
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:57:24.361559+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ANN THOMAS DAWSON v. ROBERT WAYNE DAWSON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe evidence offered by plaintiff and admitted by the court was sufficient to require submission of the case to the jury. It includes the testimony of the woman with whom plaintiff alleged defendant had committed adultery. She testified, by deposition, that defendant had sexual intercourse with her forcibly and against her will and was prosecuted therefor. This testimony was in accord with and supports plaintiff's allegations. Hence, the judgment of nonsuit is reversed.\nReversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "H. F. Seawell, Jr., for plaintiff appellant.",
      "No counsel contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ANN THOMAS DAWSON v. ROBERT WAYNE DAWSON.\n(Filed 23 September, 1964.)\nDivorce and Alimony \u00a7 14-\nTestimony of a witness by deposition that defendant bad sexual intercourse with her forcibly and against her will, and was prosecuted therefor, is sufficient to be submitted to the jury in plaintiff's action for divorce on the ground of adultery.\nAppeal by plaintiff from McLaughlin, J., April 27, 1964, Session of Moore.\nAction for absolute divorce on the ground of adultery and for custody of the child of the marriage. Defendant did not file answer. At the conclusion of plaintiff\u2019s evidence, the court, \u201con its own motion,\u201d being of the opinion the evidence \u201cas to the charge of adultery was not sufficient to be submitted to the jury,\u201d entered judgment of non-suit. Plaintiff excepted and appealed.\nH. F. Seawell, Jr., for plaintiff appellant.\nNo counsel contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0494-01",
  "first_page_order": 538,
  "last_page_order": 539
}