{
  "id": 8569772,
  "name": "SADIE L. LEDBETTER v. GRADY JUNIOR THOMAS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ledbetter v. Thomas",
  "decision_date": "1964-10-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "569",
  "last_page": "569",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "262 N.C. 569"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 68,
    "char_count": 541,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.591,
    "sha256": "8a5d6daef1ffe104c5fa2185711c50ac77b2e4c0864a1184ef0900c39d5bcbc8",
    "simhash": "1:9a8bfaa90a1606ca",
    "word_count": 85
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:57:24.361559+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "SADIE L. LEDBETTER v. GRADY JUNIOR THOMAS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nThe factual situation and the legal question involved in this appeal are identical to those in the case of Deaton v. Thomas, decided this day, ante, 565.\nOn authority of the foregoing case, the judgment of the court below is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hollowell & Stott; Bailey & Booe for plaintiff appellee.",
      "Carpenter, Webb & Golding; Childers Fowler for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "SADIE L. LEDBETTER v. GRADY JUNIOR THOMAS.\n(Filed 14 October, 1964.)\nAppeal by defendant from Brock, S. J., 3 February 1964 Schedule \u201cD\u201d nonjury Session of MeCKlenbueg.\nHollowell & Stott; Bailey & Booe for plaintiff appellee.\nCarpenter, Webb & Golding; Childers Fowler for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0569-01",
  "first_page_order": 613,
  "last_page_order": 613
}