{
  "id": 8570395,
  "name": "STATE v. DAVID CANUP",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Canup",
  "decision_date": "1964-10-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "606",
  "last_page": "607",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "262 N.C. 606"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "132 S.E. 2d 880",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "260 N.C. 352",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8574772
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/260/0352-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 182,
    "char_count": 2614,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.602,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.317852702137001e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4388647755139392
    },
    "sha256": "811363d1fe3eeeecbba3c076780e3fbe86a1a25afbf17c475eb7613f84d5273a",
    "simhash": "1:c3e084b88c982a18",
    "word_count": 440
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:57:24.361559+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. DAVID CANUP."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PeR Cueiam.\nThe determinative facts alleged in the petition are admitted in the Attorney General\u2019s answer. They appear upon the face of the record proper. The judgment of imprisonment for 15 to 20 years was in excess of the maximum permitted by law for the offense charged. State v. Blackmon, 260 N.C. 352, 132 S.E. 2d 880. The judgment of imprisonment entered against the defendant at the May Term, 1958 of the Superior Court of New Hanover County is vacated and set aside. The Superior Court will cause the defendant forthwith to be brought before the court for the imposition of a sentence not to exceed a maximum of ten years. The defendant is entitled to credit for the time served, including any allowance for his good behavior.\nCertiorari allowed.\nSentence vacated.\nCase remanded for proper judgment.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PeR Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "T. W. Bruton, Attorney General; Theodore C. Brown, Jr., Staff Attorney for the State. \u25a0\u25a0\u25a0 \u25a0",
      "No counsel for the 'petitioner."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. DAVID CANUP.\n(Filed 14 October, 1964.)\nCriminal Daw \u00a7\u00a7 139, 173\u2014\nEven though a post-conviction hearing is denied because petition therefor was not filed until more than five years after the trial, the Supreme Court will grant certiorari when it appears on the face of the record proper that defendant had been sentenced to imprisonment in excess of the maximum allowed by law for the offense charged, and the Court will vacate the judgment and remand the cause for proper judgment, with credit under such circumstances for time served, including any allowance for good behavior.\nON September 23, 1964, the defendant David Canup applied to this Court for writ of certiorari to review an order entered by Judge Bundy at the August, 1964 criminal session, New HaNOVek Superior Court, denying a post-conviction review of the defendant\u2019s trial held at the May, 1958 Term, New Hanover Superior Court. At the Post-Conviction Hearing the solicitor moved to dismiss the application for review upon the ground the trial was held at the May Term, 1958 and the application was not filed until August, 1964, more than five years after the trial. Judge Bundy allowed the motion to dismiss for the reason assigned.\nThe defendant\u2019s petition for certiorari and the Attorney General\u2019s answer disclose that the defendant, at the May Term, 1958, entered a plea of nolo contendere to a charge of possessing burglary tools. The court imposed a sentence of not less than 15 nor more than 20 years in the State\u2019s prison. The ground assigned for the review here is that the original sentence of 15 to 20 years is in excess, of the\"authorized punishment for the offense charged. We grant the writ\u2019.\nT. W. Bruton, Attorney General; Theodore C. Brown, Jr., Staff Attorney for the State. \u25a0\u25a0\u25a0 \u25a0\nNo counsel for the 'petitioner."
  },
  "file_name": "0606-01",
  "first_page_order": 650,
  "last_page_order": 651
}