{
  "id": 8568075,
  "name": "STATE v. ODIS HENRY WRIGHT",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Wright",
  "decision_date": "1964-12-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "129",
  "last_page": "129",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "263 N.C. 129"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "195 S.E. 1",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "213 N.C. 45",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8626411
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/213/0045-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 127,
    "char_count": 1150,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.617,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.855851003828089e-08,
      "percentile": 0.36332793919645506
    },
    "sha256": "cf7d7b1027b672eed97da644167e3a2d3d6710937f09ee0fbe8175023cad1abe",
    "simhash": "1:3afcdd9de2f12acd",
    "word_count": 188
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:44:48.035422+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. ODIS HENRY WRIGHT."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PeR CuRiam.\nThe State\u2019s evidence was sufficient to carry the case to the jury and to support the verdict rendered. No error sufficiently prejudicial to justify a new trial has been shown.\nWe deem it inappropriate to include herein a recital of the sordid evidence revealed by the record.\nThe verdict and judgment are upheld on authority of S. v. Spivey, 213 N.C. 45, 195 S.E. 1.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PeR CuRiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Bruton, Asst. Attorney General Richard T. Sanders for the State.",
      "Holland & Faircloth; Nance, Barrington, Collier & Singleton for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. ODIS HENRY WRIGHT.\n(Filed 2 December, 1964.)\nAppeal by defendant from Johnson, J., August Regular Mixed Session 1964 of Bladen.\nThe defendant was tried upon a bill of indictment charging that he unlawfully, wilfully and feloniously did commit the abominable and detestable crime against nature with a thirteen-year-old boy (naming him), against the form of the statute, et cetera.\nThe jury returned a verdict of guilty of an attempt to commit a crime against nature.\nThe defendant was sentenced to not less than three nor more than five years in the State\u2019s prison. He appeals, assigning error.\nAttorney General Bruton, Asst. Attorney General Richard T. Sanders for the State.\nHolland & Faircloth; Nance, Barrington, Collier & Singleton for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0129-01",
  "first_page_order": 167,
  "last_page_order": 167
}