{
  "id": 8568108,
  "name": "STATE v. TRUETT LITTLE",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Little",
  "decision_date": "1964-12-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "130",
  "last_page": "130",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "263 N.C. 130"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 133,
    "char_count": 1259,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.614,
    "sha256": "6f2e2ecfed5d63fcbd6e077dea1c8951c0e173d9706b6b035351ae0c7a16e330",
    "simhash": "1:51162550aa0c8ac9",
    "word_count": 198
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:44:48.035422+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. TRUETT LITTLE."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThere was ample evidence to support the verdict. Hence, the assignment of error directed to the court\u2019s denial of defendant\u2019s motion for judgment as of nonsuit is overruled. Moreover, it is our opinion, and we so decide, that the matters referred to in defendant\u2019s remaining assignments, if error, are not of such prejudicial nature as to constitute ground for the award of a new trial.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Sanders for the State.",
      "S. Bunn Frink and Herring, Walton, Parker & Powell for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. TRUETT LITTLE.\n(Filed 2 December, 1964.)\nAppeal by defendant from Braswell, J., May 1964 Session of BruNS-WICK.\nCriminal prosecution on warrant charging that defendant \u201cdid unlawfully and willfully fail and refuse to support his illegitimate child; Shelia Aim Formyduval, age one (1) month, begotten upon the body of Helen E. Formyduval,\u201d a violation of G.S. 49-2, tried de novo in the superior court after appeal by defendant from conviction and judgment in the Recorder\u2019s Court of Brunswick County.\nThe jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged in the warrant. Judgment imposing a prison sentence, suspended on specified conditions, was pronounced. Defendant excepted and appealed.\nAttorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Sanders for the State.\nS. Bunn Frink and Herring, Walton, Parker & Powell for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0130-01",
  "first_page_order": 168,
  "last_page_order": 168
}