{
  "id": 8571480,
  "name": "STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION v. RALEIGH FARMERS MARKET, INC., RALEIGH SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, and L. N. WEST and Wife, BETSEY JOHN H. WEST",
  "name_abbreviation": "State Highway Commission v. Raleigh Farmers Market, Inc.",
  "decision_date": "1965-03-24",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "139",
  "last_page": "140",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "264 N.C. 139"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "86 S.E. 2d 200",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "241 N.C. 616",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8615596
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/241/0616-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "139 S.E. 2d 904",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "263 N.C. 622",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8572302
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/263/0622-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 175,
    "char_count": 1811,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.572,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.676830387708631e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3558728713527314
    },
    "sha256": "bb31de83a20c60b9209c37caf49d6f693b7cdf4522f45b99fa989ddc8c39f493",
    "simhash": "1:e5b214bec2fb84db",
    "word_count": 310
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:18:06.877661+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION v. RALEIGH FARMERS MARKET, INC., RALEIGH SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, and L. N. WEST and Wife, BETSEY JOHN H. WEST."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Rodman, J.\nThe opinion in this cause, filed January 29, 1965, is reported 263 N.C. 622, 139 S.E. 2d 904.\nIn apt time, plaintiff and Farmers filed a petition to rehear. Rehearing was requested because, in the opening paragraph of the opinion, it is said: \u201cIn substance, the action of the parties amounted to a waiver of a jury trial * * The petition was allowed \u201cfor clarification of opinion with respect to right of trial by jury.\u201d\nAn order which does nothing more than settle the issues is interlocutory. An appeal from such an order is premature. DeBruhl v. Highway Com., 241 N.C. 616, 86 S.E. 2d 200. The sentence containing the quoted language was inserted merely to show that the appeal should be considered as within the spirit, if not the letter, of G.S. 1-277. It was not intended to limit, nor has either party\u2019s right to jury trial been impaired by what was said.\nThe conclusion heretofore reached is\nReaffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Rodman, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Bruton, Assistant Attorney General Lewis, Trial Attorney Rosser; Young, Moore & Henderson by Associate Counsel J. Allen Adams for the State.",
      "Manning, Fulton \u2022& Skinner and Jack P. Gulley for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION v. RALEIGH FARMERS MARKET, INC., RALEIGH SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, and L. N. WEST and Wife, BETSEY JOHN H. WEST.\n(Filed 24 March, 1965.)\n1. Appeal and Error \u00a7 53\u2014\nA petition to rehear may be granted in order to clarify a decision of the court which the parties concerned misconstrue.\n2. Appeal and Error \u00a7 59; Eminent Domain \u00a7 7a\u2014\nDecision of the Supreme Court that whether the act of the Highway Commission amounted to a \u201ctaking\u201d of a property right by eminent domain presented on the record a question of law and fact for the court, does not purport to impair either party\u2019s right to jury trial on the other issues.\nOn rehearing.\nAttorney General Bruton, Assistant Attorney General Lewis, Trial Attorney Rosser; Young, Moore & Henderson by Associate Counsel J. Allen Adams for the State.\nManning, Fulton \u2022& Skinner and Jack P. Gulley for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0139-01",
  "first_page_order": 175,
  "last_page_order": 176
}