{
  "id": 8571732,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JACK FESPERMAN",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Fesperman",
  "decision_date": "1965-04-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "160",
  "last_page": "160",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "264 N.C. 160"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 144,
    "char_count": 1670,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.553,
    "sha256": "9998dc6295596c80a873baccfd4a0f95070e183faf33f9a1591e425f88ea5d31",
    "simhash": "1:97c7d79de5bb8126",
    "word_count": 288
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:18:06.877661+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JACK FESPERMAN."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER Curiam.\nOn authority of S. v. Hord, ante 149, we hold that a duly appointed policeman of the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, is an officer of said City within the meaning of G.S. 14-230.\nThe motion to quash, allowed by the court below, will be upheld for the reasons set out in the Hord case.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Bruton, Deputy Attorney General Harry W. Mc-Galliard, Asst. Attorney General James F. Bullock for the State, appellant.",
      "Carswell & Justice for defendant appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JACK FESPERMAN.\n(Filed 7 April, 1965.)\nAppeal by the State from Latham, S.J., 14 December 1964 Conflict Criminal Session of MecicleNburg.\nThe defendant was charged in Bill of Indictment No. 42959 with having wilfully failed and refused to discharge one of his official duties as a police officer of the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, said duty being to-wit: \u201cthe arrest of Mary Trapp for setting up, maintaining and operating a place, structure and building for the purpose of prostitution and assignation, all to the knowledge of Jack Fesperman and to the injury of the public and the people of the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, all in violation of his oath and of his public duty,\u201d et cetera.\nThe defendant was charged in Bill of Indictment No. 42932 with having corruptly and wilfully failed to discharge one of his official duties with respect to the same matters set forth in Bill No. 42959.\nThe defendant moved to quash these bills on the same grounds set out in the case of S. v. Hord, filed this day, ante 149. The motion was allowed as to both bills, and the State appeals pursuant to the provisions of G.S. 15-179, and assigns error.\nAttorney General Bruton, Deputy Attorney General Harry W. Mc-Galliard, Asst. Attorney General James F. Bullock for the State, appellant.\nCarswell & Justice for defendant appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0160-01",
  "first_page_order": 196,
  "last_page_order": 196
}