{
  "id": 8575677,
  "name": "STATE v. LONNIE CORNELIUS",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Cornelius",
  "decision_date": "1965-10-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "452",
  "last_page": "452",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "265 N.C. 452"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "95 S.E. 2d 902",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "245 N.C. 344",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8610972
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/245/0344-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "113 S.E. 2d 15",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "252 N.C. 121",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8619196
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/252/0121-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "116 S.E. 2d 429",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "253 N.C. 130",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8622810
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/253/0130-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 196,
    "char_count": 2131,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.592,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.5546574315297644e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8147322488685633
    },
    "sha256": "d6be932d633e5606b78aab755f32bd788d13bf3521f8e9a3428fe7ea24a32f37",
    "simhash": "1:9ff31d084e7f1f78",
    "word_count": 372
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:31:16.118019+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. LONNIE CORNELIUS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe appellant has only one assignment of error and it purports to be based on a portion of the charge to which no exception was taken as required by the Rules of this Court. Even so, the portion of the charge complained of is set out under the assignment of error and consists in its entirety of a contention of the State.\nWe have repeatedly held that an inadvertence in stating contentions or in recapitulating the evidence must be called to the attention of the court in time for correction. After verdict, the objection comes too late. S. v. Case, 253 N.C. 130, 116 S.E. 2d 429; S. v. Holder, 252 N.C. 121, 113 S.E. 2d 15; S. v. Adams, 245 N.C. 344, 95 S.E. 2d 902.\nThere is no contention that the State\u2019s evidence was not sufficient to support the verdict.\nIn our opinion, the defendant has had a fair trial, free from any prejudicial error, and the verdict and judgment entered below will not be disturbed.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Bruton, Deputy Attorney General Ralph Moody, Staff Attorney Andrew A. Vanore, Jr., for the State.",
      "Charles V. Bell for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. LONNIE CORNELIUS.\n(Filed 13 October, 1965.)\nCriminal Law \u00a7 107\u2014\nAn inadvertence in stating the contentions of the parties or in recapitulating' the evidence must be called to the trial court\u2019s attention in time for correction.\nAppeal by defendant from Fountain, J., May Criminal Session 1964 O\u00cd MECKLENBURG.\nThe defendant was tried and convicted upon a bill of indictment charging that with intent to kill, the defendant did assault one Willie Roy McNeill with a deadly weapon, to wit, a shot gun, inflicting serious injuries not resulting in death.\nThe defendant entered a plea of not guilty. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of assault with a deadly weapon. The defendant was given a sentence of eighteen months in jail, to be assigned to work under the supervision of the State Prison Department.\nDefendant, through his counsel, gave notice of appeal, but his counsel, through no fault of the defendant, failed to perfect the appeal. We allowed certiorari on 6 April 1965 and set the case in its regular order for the Fall Term 1965.\nAttorney General Bruton, Deputy Attorney General Ralph Moody, Staff Attorney Andrew A. Vanore, Jr., for the State.\nCharles V. Bell for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0452-01",
  "first_page_order": 492,
  "last_page_order": 492
}