{
  "id": 8575856,
  "name": "STATE v. PERRY SMITH, JR.",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Smith",
  "decision_date": "1965-10-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "492",
  "last_page": "492",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "265 N.C. 492"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 131,
    "char_count": 1431,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.591,
    "sha256": "563cbaa16201b495b2f270ea84698f950784a5cacfb840e45bfc607f8b0dde21",
    "simhash": "1:36cd317d5a00859e",
    "word_count": 240
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:31:16.118019+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. PERRY SMITH, JR."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe defendant relies for a new trial upon two assignments of error: .(1) That the court erred in permitting the investigating officer to testify that the truck tracks near the scene of the theft indicated the vehicle had been stuck in the mud and in his opinion the driver had attempted to get out without calling a wrecker. (2) The defendant\u2019s incriminating admissions to the investigating officer should have been \u25a0 excluded.\nIf we concede the officer should not have been permitted to express the opinion that the driver had attempted to get the truck out of the mud without calling a wrecker, the admission was rendered harmless by the testimony of the defendant that his truck became stuck in the mud, and failing to get it out, he called a wrecker.\nWith respect to the incriminating admissions to the investigating officer, the record fails to disclose any reason why they should not be admissible as free and voluntary.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "T. W. Bruton, Attorney General, James F. Bullock, Assistant Attorney General for the State.",
      "Seila, Wilson and Palmer by W. C. Palmer for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. PERRY SMITH, JR.\n(Filed 20 October, 1965.)\nAppeal by defendant from Pless, J., May, 1965 Session, Caldwell Superior Court.\nIn this criminal prosecution the defendant was indicted, tried, convicted, and sentenced for the larceny of a radio and a set of wrenches of a value less than $200.00. The defendant appealed.\nT. W. Bruton, Attorney General, James F. Bullock, Assistant Attorney General for the State.\nSeila, Wilson and Palmer by W. C. Palmer for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0492-01",
  "first_page_order": 532,
  "last_page_order": 532
}