{
  "id": 8575875,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JESSE McCULLEN DAUGHETY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Daughety",
  "decision_date": "1965-10-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "493",
  "last_page": "494",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "265 N.C. 493"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 129,
    "char_count": 1314,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.581,
    "sha256": "a21412dd6dcc3ad9628a62659fa5afb24840c563b5fed7fe4e72865ec5135684",
    "simhash": "1:1a5787b98ed045b6",
    "word_count": 215
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:31:16.118019+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JESSE McCULLEN DAUGHETY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe State\u2019s evidence was sufficient to be submitted to the jury and defendant does not contend otherwise.\nWe have examined the assignments of error with respect to the admission of evidence and to the charge of the court, and in our opinion no prejudicial error has been shown.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Bruton, Asst. Attorney General Charles D. Bar-ham, Jr., Staff Attorney Wilson B. Partin, Jr,, for the State.",
      "Turner & Harrison for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JESSE McCULLEN DAUGHETY.\n(Filed 20 October, 1965.)\nAppeal by defendant from Mints, J., 15 March 1965 Session of Lenoir.\nThis is a criminal action tried in the Recorder\u2019s Court of Kinston, North Carolina, upon a warrant charging defendant with driving a motor vehicle upon the highways and streets while under the influence of intoxicating beverages. From a verdict of guilty and the judgment imposed, defendant appealed to the Superior Court of Lenoir County in which there was a trial de novo on the original warrant.\nThe jury returned a verdict of guilty. The court sentenced defendant to three months in jail and assigned him to work under the direction of the State Prison Department. Execution of the sentence was suspended upon condition that defendant pay a fine of $300.00 and costs. Defendant appeals, assigning error.\nAttorney General Bruton, Asst. Attorney General Charles D. Bar-ham, Jr., Staff Attorney Wilson B. Partin, Jr,, for the State.\nTurner & Harrison for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0493-02",
  "first_page_order": 533,
  "last_page_order": 534
}