{
  "id": 8560790,
  "name": "STATE v. WILLIAM ROBERT WHITE, JR.",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. White",
  "decision_date": "1966-01-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "361",
  "last_page": "362",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "266 N.C. 361"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "137 S.E. 2d 819",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "262 N.C. 472",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8568369
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "474"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/262/0472-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 153,
    "char_count": 1679,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.57,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.7817273071113374e-08,
      "percentile": 0.30088858462404566
    },
    "sha256": "d18c16fbe6af8c6ad21bc5fc207f65afe01b20e0df2a7ba1f403824d33d22ce1",
    "simhash": "1:5f82beb9c61443c9",
    "word_count": 283
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:16:51.556627+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. WILLIAM ROBERT WHITE, JR."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER Cubiam.\nThe court was of the opinion, and rightly so, that the amended warrant was insufficient to charge a violation of G.S. 14-223. See S. v. Smith, 262 N.C. 472, 474, 137 S.E. 2d 819, and cases cited. Hence, the trial was conducted solely with reference to whether defendant was guilty of a simple assault on Reece Coble, a police officer.\nDefendant\u2019s motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit was properly overruled. The matters referred to in defendant\u2019s exceptions to the charge are not considered of such prejudicial nature as to justify a new trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Bullock for the State.",
      "James C. Harper for defendant appella/nt."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. WILLIAM ROBERT WHITE, JR.\n(Filed 14 January, 1966.)\nAppeal by defendant from Houk, JJuly 1965 Session of Chatham.\nDefendant was convicted of resisting arrest and of assault on an officer and judgment was pronounced in the Chatham County Recorder\u2019s Court. He appealed to the Superior Court of Chatham County and .was there tried de novo upon an amended warrant which, in part, charged that defendant \u201cdid unlawfully and wilfully resist, delay and obstruct a public officer, to wit: Reece Coble, a Policeman for the Town of Pittsboro, while he, the said Reece Coble was attempting to discharge and discharging a duty of his office, to wit: by striking the said Reece Coble with his fist.\u201d\nEvidence was offered by the State and by defendant.\nThe .jury returned a verdict of \u201cGuilty of Assault.\u201d The court pronounced judgment \u201cthat the defendant be confined in the common jail of Chatham County for a period of ten (10) days.\u201d\nAttorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Bullock for the State.\nJames C. Harper for defendant appella/nt."
  },
  "file_name": "0361-01",
  "first_page_order": 397,
  "last_page_order": 398
}