#### BERNICE T. HAGINS v. SOUTH ATLANTIC BONDED WAREHOUSE CORPORATION, ALLIED VAN LINES, INC., and REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF GREENSBORO

No. 685

(Filed 31 January 1969)

Appeal by plaintiff from the decision of the Court of Appeals (reported in 1 N.C. App. 56, 159 S.E. 2d 596) affirming the judgment of Crissman, J., entered at the 2 October 1967 Civil Session of Guilford, Greensboro Division.

Comer & Harrelson ■¡or plaintiff appellant.

D. Newton Farnell, Jr., Jordan, Wright, Nichols, Caffrey & Hill for South Atlantic Bonded Warehouse Corporation and Allied Van Lines, Inc., defendant appellees.

Cannon, Wolfe, Coggin <fe Taylor for Redevelopment Commission of Greensboro, defendant appellee.

PER CüRiam.

This is a companion case to Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission, decided this day and reported ante 90. It is referred to in sufficient detail in the statement of facts in that case to disclose that decision there controls decision here. See also the statement of facts preceding the final five paragraphs in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. 1 N.C. App. 56, 61, 159 S.E. 2d 596, 600.

*108For the reasons stated in Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and this cause is remanded to that Court with the direction that it vacate the judgment of the Superior Court from which plaintiff appealed and remand the case to that court for such further proceedings, consistent with the legal principles herein enunciated, as may be initiated.

Error and remanded.