{
  "id": 8570647,
  "name": "STATE v. KERSH",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Kersh",
  "decision_date": "1971-10-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 108",
  "first_page": "513",
  "last_page": "513",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "279 N.C. 513"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "12 N.C. App. 80",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8547460
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/12/0080-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 27,
    "char_count": 170,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.64,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20655181054957258
    },
    "sha256": "e54f6f37e7cff397e1c258f2c828ba2bf3bd799f3bdb1b0720d70756d2845d29",
    "simhash": "1:ae8b0079d53efc10",
    "word_count": 28
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:36:58.436463+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. KERSH"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 October 1971.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. KERSH\nNo. 108.\nCase below: 12 N.C. App. 80."
  },
  "file_name": "0513-01",
  "first_page_order": 541,
  "last_page_order": 541
}