{
  "id": 8576829,
  "name": "STATE v. BANDY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Bandy",
  "decision_date": "1972-08-31",
  "docket_number": "No. 36",
  "first_page": "759",
  "last_page": "759",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "281 N.C. 759"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "15 N.C. App. 175",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8548422
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/15/0175-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 27,
    "char_count": 170,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.571,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20673212994271095
    },
    "sha256": "2697cc48d0f54ba8a131ccbb10b4cb160e163c09cd3fe791c7c2b94d471b0809",
    "simhash": "1:bfbe0a5f7f2e7407",
    "word_count": 28
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:53:41.611741+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. BANDY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 31 August 1972.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. BANDY\nNo. 36.\nCase below: 15 N.C. App. 175."
  },
  "file_name": "0759-04",
  "first_page_order": 787,
  "last_page_order": 787
}