{
  "id": 8564343,
  "name": "STATE v. PENLAND",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Penland",
  "decision_date": "1974-01-09",
  "docket_number": "No. 21",
  "first_page": "621",
  "last_page": "621",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "284 N.C. 621"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "20 N.C. App. 73",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8549418
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/20/0073-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 27,
    "char_count": 171,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.672,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20630565720240832
    },
    "sha256": "3c8457529ba55372f54bd646df83e3bb4e05b8331851dd3cfcc05f1fde05c5a9",
    "simhash": "1:4bb804f8f97efcd2",
    "word_count": 28
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:23:00.028129+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. PENLAND"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 9 January 1974.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. PENLAND\nNo. 21.\nCase below: 20 N.C. App. 73."
  },
  "file_name": "0621-04",
  "first_page_order": 641,
  "last_page_order": 641
}