{
  "id": 8563842,
  "name": "WATCH CO. v. BRAND DISTRIBUTORS; and WATCH CO. v. MOTOR MARKET",
  "name_abbreviation": "Watch Co. v. Brand Distributors",
  "decision_date": "1974-03-26",
  "docket_number": "No. 67",
  "first_page": "237",
  "last_page": "237",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "285 N.C. 237"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "20 N.C. App. 648",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8554892
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/20/0648-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 31,
    "char_count": 208,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.66,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20628673718043022
    },
    "sha256": "97fd88c0f9aec37c745888e08cdff6d59eb0255d6ee14bd2ea435fc2b58b7c08",
    "simhash": "1:f938ad314694cd84",
    "word_count": 35
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:42:08.335271+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WATCH CO. v. BRAND DISTRIBUTORS and WATCH CO. v. MOTOR MARKET"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion of plaintiff to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 26 March 1974.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WATCH CO. v. BRAND DISTRIBUTORS and WATCH CO. v. MOTOR MARKET\nNo. 67.\nCase below: 20 N.C. App. 648."
  },
  "file_name": "0237-05",
  "first_page_order": 269,
  "last_page_order": 269
}