{
  "id": 8570242,
  "name": "IN RE BULLARD",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Bullard",
  "decision_date": "1974-09-24",
  "docket_number": "No. 57",
  "first_page": "758",
  "last_page": "758",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "285 N.C. 758"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "22 N.C. App. 245",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11302131
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/22/0245-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 27,
    "char_count": 175,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.618,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2065375240023646
    },
    "sha256": "6084525fcfbc1d692783606c4a6a52b1b627c47d17bb4285c39e2fef534a30ad",
    "simhash": "1:2bba09695d3e3095",
    "word_count": 28
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:42:08.335271+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN RE BULLARD"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": ". Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 24 September, 1974.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN RE BULLARD\nNo. 57.\nCase below: 22 N.C. App. 245."
  },
  "file_name": "0758-01",
  "first_page_order": 790,
  "last_page_order": 790
}