{
  "id": 8563290,
  "name": "FRANK E. RHODES v. HOGG & ALLEN, Professional Association, Successor to GREENE, HOGG & ALLEN, Professional Association, and GLENN L. GREENE, JR.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rhodes v. Hogg & Allen",
  "decision_date": "1974-11-26",
  "docket_number": "No. 86",
  "first_page": "40",
  "last_page": "41",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "286 N.C. 40"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "207 S.E. 2d 267",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "22 N.C. App. 548",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        11309117,
        11309038
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/22/0548-02",
        "/nc-app/22/0548-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "209 S.E. 2d 795",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "286 N.C. 24",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8563251
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/286/0024-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 102,
    "char_count": 1055,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.613,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20626009470050186
    },
    "sha256": "6f2ddfb0cb50743f29f6f82c6fb17ebdbbaf89e02d29072a555067c38a0b5816",
    "simhash": "1:ad1b30f386ef9f7e",
    "word_count": 177
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:24:13.966890+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Chief Justice Bobbitt not sitting."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "FRANK E. RHODES v. HOGG & ALLEN, Professional Association, Successor to GREENE, HOGG & ALLEN, Professional Association, and GLENN L. GREENE, JR."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "BRANCH, Justice.\nOther than the party plaintiff and the amount in controversy, the material facts in this case are the' same as in the case of Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, 286 N.C. 24, 209 S.E. 2d 795, filed this day.\nFor the reasons stated in that case, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and this cause is remanded to that Court with direction that the cause be remanded to the Superior Court of Wilkes County for proceedings consistent with this opinion.\nReversed and remanded.\nChief Justice Bobbitt not sitting.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "BRANCH, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "McElwee, Hall and McElwee, by W. H. McElwee and T. V. Adams, for plaintiff-appellant.",
      "Hudson, Petree, Stockton, Stockton, and Robinson, by Ralph M. Stockton, Jr., and James H. Kelly, Jr., for defendant-appellee, Hogg and Allen, P.A."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "FRANK E. RHODES v. HOGG & ALLEN, Professional Association, Successor to GREENE, HOGG & ALLEN, Professional Association, and GLENN L. GREENE, JR.\nNo. 86\n(Filed 26 November 1974)\nON appeal, pursuant to G.S. 7A-30(2), from the decision of the Court of Appeals, 22 N.C. App. 548, 207 S.E. 2d 267.\nMcElwee, Hall and McElwee, by W. H. McElwee and T. V. Adams, for plaintiff-appellant.\nHudson, Petree, Stockton, Stockton, and Robinson, by Ralph M. Stockton, Jr., and James H. Kelly, Jr., for defendant-appellee, Hogg and Allen, P.A."
  },
  "file_name": "0040-01",
  "first_page_order": 60,
  "last_page_order": 61
}