{
  "id": 8567032,
  "name": "STATE v. LISK",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Lisk",
  "decision_date": "1975-08-25",
  "docket_number": "No. 27",
  "first_page": "248",
  "last_page": "248",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "288 N.C. 248"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "25 N.C. App. 659",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8556030
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/25/0659-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 26,
    "char_count": 172,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.673,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20640585609431283
    },
    "sha256": "5d311e87b520c33a00f98f8cef246136014097a7e5d742ee9f21e0b9cd7a9bdf",
    "simhash": "1:aebb1fcb75367497",
    "word_count": 28
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:59:08.487022+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. LISK"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": ". Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial 'constitutional question allowed 25 August 1975.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. LISK\nNo. 27.\nCase below: 25 N.C. App. 659."
  },
  "file_name": "0248-02",
  "first_page_order": 268,
  "last_page_order": 268
}