{
  "id": 8570883,
  "name": "IN RE ARTHUR",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Arthur",
  "decision_date": "1975-12-17",
  "docket_number": "No. 106 PC",
  "first_page": "730",
  "last_page": "730",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "288 N.C. 730"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "27 N.C. App. 227",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8552166
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/27/0227-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 250,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.556,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20656088443766413
    },
    "sha256": "0ea57e267902ba9a7ddc6cec129b7a31098af81d0d78c8453dbd5a9dbf54c170",
    "simhash": "1:0bba08dbc436e8bd",
    "word_count": 40
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:59:08.487022+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN RE ARTHUR"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 17 December 1975. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 17 December 1975.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN RE ARTHUR\nNo. 106 PC.\nCase below: 27 N.C. App. 227."
  },
  "file_name": "0730-05",
  "first_page_order": 750,
  "last_page_order": 750
}