{
  "id": 8568951,
  "name": "STATE v. HANCOCK",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Hancock",
  "decision_date": "1976-02-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 11 PC",
  "first_page": "300",
  "last_page": "300",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "289 N.C. 300"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "28 N.C. App. 149",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8547266
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/28/0149-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 251,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.683,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2064894517016243
    },
    "sha256": "8bd9d7226e98dce1e385f8e3cb81f2a9a4b909e86d8c40b4f4f9b22b59d28ae3",
    "simhash": "1:8abb25fbff36600d",
    "word_count": 40
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:21:01.191113+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. HANCOCK"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 February 1976. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 February 1976.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. HANCOCK\nNo. 11 PC.\nCase below: 28 N.C. App. 149."
  },
  "file_name": "0300-02",
  "first_page_order": 320,
  "last_page_order": 320
}