{
  "id": 8571946,
  "name": "STATE v. ANDERSON and PRETTY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Anderson",
  "decision_date": "1976-04-06",
  "docket_number": "No. 79 PC",
  "first_page": "615",
  "last_page": "615",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "289 N.C. 615"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "28 N.C. App. 591",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 37,
    "char_count": 257,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.723,
    "sha256": "c837b3d427de93969b0c63efad8bdf7c4d4778a7ac89fd8b6fe3d41d1dcfde3b",
    "simhash": "1:13be0dfbd906b826",
    "word_count": 42
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:21:01.191113+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. ANDERSON and PRETTY"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 April 1976. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 6 April 1976.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. ANDERSON and PRETTY\nNo. 79 PC.\nCase below: 28 N.C. App. 591."
  },
  "file_name": "0615-05",
  "first_page_order": 635,
  "last_page_order": 635
}