{
  "id": 8572842,
  "name": "STATE v. EVANS AND ATKINSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Evans",
  "decision_date": "1976-05-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 102 PC",
  "first_page": "726",
  "last_page": "726",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "289 N.C. 726"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "28 N.C. App. 729",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 37,
    "char_count": 253,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.72,
    "sha256": "58162d7df8ae0685ad80b166e3f1f9f1f3a70089d00d6d5799da93f12a07528d",
    "simhash": "1:06bd256bd5266c13",
    "word_count": 42
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:21:01.191113+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. EVANS AND ATKINSON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 May 1976. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 3 May 1976.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. EVANS AND ATKINSON\nNo. 102 PC.\nCase below: 28 N.C. App. 729."
  },
  "file_name": "0726-05",
  "first_page_order": 746,
  "last_page_order": 746
}