{
  "id": 8563487,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BROWER and JOHNSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Brower & Johnson",
  "decision_date": "1977-09-12",
  "docket_number": "No. 27 PC",
  "first_page": "259",
  "last_page": "259",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "293 N.C. 259"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "53 L.Ed. 2d 306",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "L. Ed. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        6178254
      ],
      "year": 1977,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "316, n. 8"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/432/0233-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "289 N.C. 644",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8572613
      ],
      "year": 1976,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/289/0644-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 85,
    "char_count": 704,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.822,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2062691685885934
    },
    "sha256": "fc922afaddbe8ae99d51cd8dd55a820b227df46ae206cc8d2a27720604dd0d59",
    "simhash": "1:0919d7aa8b9302c1",
    "word_count": 122
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:59:49.379337+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "James G. Exum, Jr. Associate Justice"
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BROWER and JOHNSON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION\nINASMUCH as defendants did not assign as error on appeal the failure of the trial judge to place the burden of proving the absence of heat of passion or the absence of self-defense on the state, see State v. Brower & Johnson, 289 N.C. 644 (1976), they have waived their right now to complain about such errors. Hankerson v. North Carolina, --- U.S. ---, 53 L.Ed. 2d 306, 316, n. 8 (1977). Now, therefore, it is\nORDERED by the Court in Conference that defendants\u2019 motion for reconsideration be and it is hereby denied.\nThis the 12th day of September, 1977.\nJames G. Exum, Jr. Associate Justice\nFor the Court",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BROWER and JOHNSON\nNo. 27 PC"
  },
  "file_name": "0259-01",
  "first_page_order": 293,
  "last_page_order": 293
}