{
  "id": 8565094,
  "name": "CRAIG v. KESSING",
  "name_abbreviation": "Craig v. Kessing",
  "decision_date": "1978-08-29",
  "docket_number": "No. 189 PC",
  "first_page": "549",
  "last_page": "549",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "295 N.C. 549"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "36 N.C. App. 389",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8553900
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/36/0389-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 59,
    "char_count": 444,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.8,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.206334423358273
    },
    "sha256": "1a76330a9086ae6cd5e3807672298fa2dcab904f16a698858af80127a402cd15",
    "simhash": "1:0cfe0f79cee7e4b1",
    "word_count": 69
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:50:00.775554+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CRAIG v. KESSING"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Motion of plaintiff to dismiss defendant\u2019s appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 29 August 1978. Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed for limited purpose of determining whether Court of Appeals erred in deciding parol evidence was inadmissible to show instrument in question had been altered or added to after its execution.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CRAIG v. KESSING\nNo. 189 PC.\nCase below: 36 N.C. App. 389."
  },
  "file_name": "0549-03",
  "first_page_order": 581,
  "last_page_order": 581
}