{
  "id": 8572455,
  "name": "CITY OF DURHAM v. KEEN",
  "name_abbreviation": "City of Durham v. Keen",
  "decision_date": "1979-07-12",
  "docket_number": "No. 161 PC",
  "first_page": "608",
  "last_page": "608",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "297 N.C. 608"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "40 N.C. App. 652",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8552534
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/40/0652-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 38,
    "char_count": 270,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.76,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20661590695055967
    },
    "sha256": "b968fff47f1429116378efeb4bd20d478353f408305de2038eac7495b49a566e",
    "simhash": "1:88b9abe85663b42e",
    "word_count": 44
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:00:46.792762+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CITY OF DURHAM v. KEEN"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 July 1979. Motion of additional defendants to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 12 July 1979.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CITY OF DURHAM v. KEEN\nNo. 161 PC.\nCase below: 40 N.C. App. 652."
  },
  "file_name": "0608-05",
  "first_page_order": 640,
  "last_page_order": 640
}