{
  "id": 11958464,
  "name": "Same vs. Mosely",
  "name_abbreviation": "Same v. Mosely",
  "decision_date": "1797-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "6",
  "last_page": "6",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 6"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 6"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1152,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.355,
    "sha256": "ccd0c645fd2f883662afae665c15bbb7553aa642f615b43daf13e16ffbd35ffd",
    "simhash": "1:5a5f565b9ab7ff6c",
    "word_count": 224
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Williams and Haywood."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Same vs. Mosely."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "2'cr Curiam.\nWilliams and Haywood.\nAfter the point bad-beeu reserved and argued, the latter words of this conversation., admit the debt has never been paid ; the former admit the defendants signature. An admission o\u00ed the signature, it is true, is no admission of the debt; for still it may be usurious, a gaming debt, or the money may have been paid, or il may be Under some other circumstances which render it not a just debt r. but when he says Rosser ought to pay it, I will speak to him about it \u2014 -this shews the debt is not paid; and though he says at the same time, 5 will not pay it \u2014 yet being legally due from him, the law will compel him to pay it.\nThere was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff,",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "2'cr Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Same vs. Mosely.\nA'* ASE upon a note of hand and the act of limitation pleaded. The note was dated and made payable in the year V\u00cd7S \u2014 \u2014 This action was commenced in the year 1?82, hut the plaintiff proved the note was presented to Mosely not longer than a-month or two before the beginning of the action \u2014 who raid, \u201c ft was at the desire of ray mother I gave it; I will not pay it ; liosser ought to pay it; I will speak to him about it."
  },
  "file_name": "0006-01",
  "first_page_order": 10,
  "last_page_order": 10
}