{
  "id": 11959870,
  "name": "Henry vs. Heritage",
  "name_abbreviation": "Henry v. Heritage",
  "decision_date": "1798-03",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "38",
  "last_page": "39",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 38"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 38"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 125,
    "char_count": 1095,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.244,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.1835207882369154e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3204923846461962
    },
    "sha256": "eb2af21ed68370d3bb1da3a9d37c32294d93c5e1a0cc05fa01f1d954939cbfaa",
    "simhash": "1:74119aac2c608dc4",
    "word_count": 199
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Henry vs. Heritage."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "\u2018Per curiam-\nLet there be. a new trial, but it cannot be \u2022court au urged by the defendant\u2019s counsel 5 that has been Ik decided, and upon this giouud \u2014 the act of 1777, ch. 1, sec. 6, and 1779, ch. 4, sec. 1, both taken together, shew it to have been the intent of ib\u00bb legislature that these trials- should be iit the county where \u00ab.he premises lie, either upon the premises or at the bar of the county court, and notout of the county ; and for this reason they could not permit an appeal to the superior court; this court now interferes by virtue of its general superintending power in order to prevent injustice or a defect of justice ; but it will interiore no further thou absolutely necessary ; fir titese ends the verdict will be set aside and new ti id. allowed ; but that must be where the legislature \u00a1us directed at the bar of the county court or on the premises.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "\u2018Per curiam-"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Henry vs. Heritage.\nf^ERT\u00edOR\u00c1RI in re .-nove proceedings below,-on a caviat be-'-s tw\u00e9en the parties, and the affidavit stated sufficient reason for ordering a new trial, which .was not contradicted by opposite riiEthmiSo"
  },
  "file_name": "0038-01",
  "first_page_order": 42,
  "last_page_order": 43
}