{
  "id": 11961050,
  "name": "Harromond vs. M'Glaughon",
  "name_abbreviation": "Harromond v. M'Glaughon",
  "decision_date": "1798-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "67",
  "last_page": "67",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 67"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 67"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 109,
    "char_count": 1083,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.394,
    "sha256": "8f0544c3149612238341b8047ea6c837b1c24c21ec9f0304701090852ab379d5",
    "simhash": "1:85f940237719cb80",
    "word_count": 184
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Haywood* Judge only in court"
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Harromond vs. M'Glaughon."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per curiam.\nHaywood* Judge only in court\nWhen a deed,, patent or grant, describes, a boundary from a certain point down a. riv.er,. creek, or. the like,, mentioning also course and distance, should the latter be found: not to -agree with the course of the river, creek, &c. it should not be regarded, but the river shall be taken to be the true boundary..\nVerdict and judgment, accordingly for. the. defendant.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Edenton,\nOctober Term, 1798;\nHarromond vs. M'Glaughon.\nTj1 JE.CTM.ENT. .The plaintiff claimed under a- state grant issued in the year 1737, for the land in question ; being a tract bounded.by the river Cashoke, on one side, and then from, the river so as to include a tract supposed,to.have been left out of the patent hereafter mentioned..\nThe defendant claimed under an old patent issued about fifty years ago,, beginning at a hickory standing, not far from the river,, thence- down the river a. certain course and- distance, which course ran obliquely from the river, and left between it and the river the triangular piece, of, land,, for which this action is brought."
  },
  "file_name": "0067-01",
  "first_page_order": 71,
  "last_page_order": 71
}