{
  "id": 11961935,
  "name": "Blount, Executor of Ogden, vs. Starkley's administrators",
  "name_abbreviation": "Blount v. Starkley's administrators",
  "decision_date": "1799-03",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "75",
  "last_page": "75",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 75"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 75"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 45,
    "char_count": 359,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.313,
    "sha256": "359226ce812865d477691f85ac428194b5b4bfda9d2f3b9c7962ffbb264773f0",
    "simhash": "1:701c610735863720",
    "word_count": 60
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Blount, Executor of Ogden, vs. Starkley's administrators."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER curiam,\nAn order lor mnr.w sent to the plaintiff and retained bji him,, is evidence t..at the money was advanced, as the order directs but an order for delivery of goods retained* is not of itself sufficient evidence of the delivery \u2014 -there should be some additional evidence to prove that fact.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER curiam,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Blount, Executor of Ogden, vs. Starkley's administrators."
  },
  "file_name": "0075-01",
  "first_page_order": 79,
  "last_page_order": 79
}