{
  "id": 11963442,
  "name": "Ingles vs. Donaldson",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ingles v. Donaldson",
  "decision_date": "1799-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "101",
  "last_page": "101",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 101"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 101"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 24,
    "char_count": 182,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.383,
    "sha256": "1864b7fa35674551c865c6d16032a55ff021dce61853a1ad285c0efc39e2cd68",
    "simhash": "1:7d94ba508daad0ae",
    "word_count": 29
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Ingles vs. Donaldson."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "T\u2019HIS cause coming on again, and the same evidence given as before, Moore, judge, was of opinion the transaction was fraudulent and void, and Ingles recovered:",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Ingles vs. Donaldson."
  },
  "file_name": "0101-03",
  "first_page_order": 105,
  "last_page_order": 105
}