{
  "id": 11964557,
  "name": "Blake and Green vs. Wheaton",
  "name_abbreviation": "Blake v. Wheaton",
  "decision_date": "1799-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "109",
  "last_page": "110",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 109"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 109"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "2 Doug. 653",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Doug.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 132,
    "char_count": 1238,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.287,
    "sha256": "5fe652a7766f1703c4841b0ded7a46fb7057977c727993322a10cff253cadd43",
    "simhash": "1:44717dc68782f1c4",
    "word_count": 226
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "John Louis Tayloe, jo.\\'i JLyywood, J. Judges."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Blake and Green vs. Wheaton."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per curiam.\nWe rriav consider this paper as an authority op-power given by both partners to Wfaeadim, to draw on the partnership effects in favor of some third person ; and as an engagement of the partners, that it shall be paid, which is an acceptance ; and then it is an order di-awn by Wheafbn and accepted by himself and partner in favor of the plaintiffs, which is a-valid-contract. It is not unusual for partners to draw, payable to themselves or their order; 2 Doug. 653 : and lor one or both-to endorse to some third person, then why not two promise to pay to the order of one i\nJudgment for the plaintiffs.,",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Wilmington,\nNovember Term, 1799.\nJohn Louis Tayloe, jo.\\'i JLyywood, J. Judges.\nBlake and Green vs. Wheaton.\nVy'BS.;i and his partner drew a note pavable to Whet - * * ion o> order, who endorsed to the plaintiffs. \u2014 -There was a verdict for dm plaintiffs, and a motion in arrest of judgment; and upon argument, Mr. Jocelyn insisted that while .he note was in the hands of Wheatbon, no action Could be maintained upon it; he being one of the payers as well as the pavtc, ho : oiild not fjit'\u00ed him -elf, nor could he sue another alone ; and as he bad no right of action himself, he could not \u00fcansfer sach right te another."
  },
  "file_name": "0109-02",
  "first_page_order": 113,
  "last_page_order": 114
}