{
  "id": 11964820,
  "name": "Burnside vs. Green, Aminisirator, &c. versus Witherspoon, Administrator of Nash",
  "name_abbreviation": "Burnside v. Green",
  "decision_date": "1800-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "112",
  "last_page": "113",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 112"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 112"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 232,
    "char_count": 2144,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.248,
    "sha256": "13ec86c4cb1804fbfd947a0919159bf120af2416f82b475698260dc0b1c7d24e",
    "simhash": "1:6be901985902cee3",
    "word_count": 383
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Burnside vs. Green, Aminisirator, &c. versus Witherspoon, Administrator of Nash."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per curiam\nThe specialought not to issue till that return : We will adhere to piece dents even where they cot\u00bb\u00a35o\u00a9 us so narrower limits than the reason of them requires.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per curiam"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Burnside vs. Green, Aminisirator, &c. versus Witherspoon, Administrator of Nash.\n'PLAINTIFFS in these causes had obtained judgments with\u00bb out any pleas on the part of the defendants doming their having assets : and an execution had issued in the first instance, \u2022'.\u2022.-'nmanding the sheriff to levy the debt de bonis te&tatoris si, &c, st \u00abon. then de bonis propriis: And Judge Taylor, on ihecom-\u00abda'.nt. of.ahe defendants, had issued a supersedeas. And now Woods argued, Aat there is not any book which warrants so \u25a0\u00bb!?*:-or a proceeding. Even Pettif-i\u2019s case, recorred by Lord Cand adverted to by Wentworth, page US, will not permit a fa. to be levied de bonis propriis, until a return of nulla bena\u201e Am: as to the cases in \u00edhis-siate, II lywood\u2019s Reports, 218, 293, ..... farther than to warrant a special fi. fa. a\u00edc; r nulla bona re-\u2022\u00abmen to a general one. Cases may happen wheie even that mod-: will be found subject to inconvenience; for suppose alter Sadgmeot, the personal chattel which the ev\u201clit\u00e9 w for ij.uririirg tbs plaintiiF\u2019s demand-. should perish !'ri.-.\\ \"he -i-ii-'\u00abion ssus5.sc; j the sheriff would retara nulla hon.\\ \u00bfa- epeeiri fi./a. woa-.\u00e1 iinawdntelv kaue without g ving to ii-t .d! ,m,; 4nv opportaaity to discharge himself by shewing the .teoe.u* \u00a1cla of his assets. I should therefore contebd, we.e it not for P rifer\u2019s esse, and the strong intimation given in the cases decide., in this state, that a scire facias should go 5 for there mus\u00ed be a Mew judgment to suppe-tt this special jfi.ja.- \u2014 The first judgment will not, for that is to be levied de bonis lestatoris, itnd the damages de bonis propriis : and surely it is a little out o\u00ed the common course to give a new judgment in the absence of the defendant:,, upon the mere return of nulla Lena, that it should be levied de bonis propriis. However, what 1 wish to establish at present, is, that a specialJ?. fa* shall not issue until there be a return of nulla bona\u00a1 he cited Impey, 405."
  },
  "file_name": "0112-01",
  "first_page_order": 116,
  "last_page_order": 117
}