{
  "id": 11966751,
  "name": "Manning vs. Brickell",
  "name_abbreviation": "Manning v. Brickell",
  "decision_date": "1801-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "133",
  "last_page": "134",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 133"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 133"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 100,
    "char_count": 1012,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.374,
    "sha256": "5544fb4a79cf30c1d1354030be3d967381630482814e6feb680199b5930b7977",
    "simhash": "1:83e9a31e4120492e",
    "word_count": 171
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Manning vs. Brickell."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "T)ER curiam:\nBrickeil endorsed a note to Manning and -*\u2022 Byrne, partners in trade, as satisfaction for a precedent debt due to the partnership : which note was released by-Brick-eil to the maker before the endorsement. An action was commenced against the maker, and on that circumstance appearing, was dismissed, and the note returned to Brickeil: then the ps.-trciship was dissolved and a receiver appointed, and this was published in a Ga2ette which circulated in the town where Brickeil lived: After which, Brickeil paid the debt t\u00a9 Byrne; and I am of opinion that if Brickeil knew of the appointment of the receiver, his payment after such knowlege to one of the partners was void; and that Byrne being since dead,. the surviving partner is entitled to recover.\n\u2022 The jury found for the defendant j and a new trial being moved for, the judge refused it, saying, it would be a hard case 0\u00bb the defendant should a recovery be effected \u2014 -and therefore'he-' would not disturb the verdict.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "T)ER curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Manning vs. Brickell."
  },
  "file_name": "0133-01",
  "first_page_order": 137,
  "last_page_order": 138
}