{
  "id": 11967344,
  "name": "Anonymous",
  "name_abbreviation": "Anonymous",
  "decision_date": "1801-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "136",
  "last_page": "136",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 136"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 136"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 48,
    "char_count": 346,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.366,
    "sha256": "c038dd74826cb5210eb60e908dbfcd201409b615f15eb43ffe45e5bcfda6cddf",
    "simhash": "1:2f2d167a39897c21",
    "word_count": 60
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Johnston, Judge"
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Anonymous."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "T5ER curiam.\nJohnston, Judge\nA demand is net necessary to precede the action of detinue, in order to support it. The practice of requiring a demand t\u00a9 be proved on the trial, originated from a decision some years ago at Edenton \u2014 but the law is clearly otherwise ; and I never could discover the principles on which that decision wenU",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "T5ER curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Anonymous."
  },
  "file_name": "0136-02",
  "first_page_order": 140,
  "last_page_order": 140
}