{
  "id": 11968101,
  "name": "Simpson vs. Nadeau",
  "name_abbreviation": "Simpson v. Nadeau",
  "decision_date": "1801-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "141",
  "last_page": "142",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 141"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 141"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1079,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.365,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.3776877221195043e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2748210416900754
    },
    "sha256": "abe033bf3dd2773719423bc9fe695f80625260f9d0cdc74d5ab164a60998d14b",
    "simhash": "1:afe6bb7b48c2cb26",
    "word_count": 186
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Simpson vs. Nadeau."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "T%ER curiam,\nThe British and French nations being at war\u00bb a Frenchman captured the plaintiff, a citizen of the United States of America, carried his vessel and cargo into a Spanish port, and disposed of both without condemnation. '\nPer curiam. The captor is suable only in the court of admiralty, notwithstanding the argument, so much pressed by the plaintiff5^ counsel, that the prise court of the admiralty could proceed only where the thing taken was in its custody or power; and as to the instance court of the admiralty, that its jurisdiction was concurrent with the courts of common law; and notwithstanding another argument also used by him, that according t\u00f3 Che six carpenters5, case and other cases, the defendant\u2019s not car* tying the vessel into port for condemnation, as his commission required, shews tfio anima the seizure was made, which was not tp treat her as a prize ; consequently she was not taken asfriz^ bat by a trespass or wrong.\nHaywood, for the Plaintiff,\n1 Robinson's Reports, 100, 119.\n2 Bl. Com. 107. 1 Dou. 98, 99.\n2 Erown, 220.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "T%ER curiam,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Haywood, for the Plaintiff,"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Simpson vs. Nadeau."
  },
  "file_name": "0141-01",
  "first_page_order": 145,
  "last_page_order": 146
}