{
  "id": 11973319,
  "name": "Robinson's executors vs. Kenon's executors",
  "name_abbreviation": "Robinson's executors v. Kenon's executors",
  "decision_date": "1802-05",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "181",
  "last_page": "182",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 181"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 181"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 56,
    "char_count": 412,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.325,
    "sha256": "0751929e2a3233d5a55904c196e28f073d68fd8d96beb591d54dd63e33026c0c",
    "simhash": "1:00e2f41b492844ef",
    "word_count": 69
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Robinson's executors vs. Kenon's executors."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "J0HNSTQN., Judge.\nThis is an action by one surety against ** another to recover a proportion of the snotties paid for the prt-o.pal. There is no case to support such sn action. That such action is not supportable was lately decided at Hillsborough* The plaintiff must resort to equity for a contribution or reimbursement.\n^uere de hoc, et vide 2 Bos. & P. 368 to 274.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "J0HNSTQN., Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Robinson's executors vs. Kenon's executors."
  },
  "file_name": "0181-04",
  "first_page_order": 185,
  "last_page_order": 186
}