{
  "id": 11975912,
  "name": "Alston, Young & Co. vs. Richard Ward's executors",
  "name_abbreviation": "Alston v. Richard Ward's executors",
  "decision_date": "1802-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "222",
  "last_page": "223",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 222"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 222"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 147,
    "char_count": 1643,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.41,
    "sha256": "7ad5560639f8c2d2fb648a6f506724c71126a7070c2e39523f5bf5f6279b6028",
    "simhash": "1:cc4be59c832e8ec2",
    "word_count": 302
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Alston, Young & Co. vs. Richard Ward's executors."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "rT,HE defendant pleaded the act of 1715; to which the plaintiff replied. And there was a verdict, subject to the opinion of the court, whether, as part of the seven years were in the time of the war, that time should be disregarded. Secondly ; whether the executor, having not paid over the assets, is not yet liable by virtue of the act of 1784, ch. 23, which directs \u201c That as soon-*6,as an administrator- shall have finished his administration on \u201c such estates, and no creditor shall make any further demand, \u201c the reside of such estate shall be deposited in the treasury, \u201cthere to remain without interest, subject to the claim of cre- \u201c ditors and to the lawful representatives of the decedent, \u201c without being subject to limitation of time.\u201d The executor is not within the latter part of the act of 1715, ch. 4-8, sec. 9 ; for the law gave to the executor, all that was not disposea of: whereas, that part of the ninth section we are speaking of, directs \u201c That if it shall happen that any sum or sums of money \u201c shall hereafter remain in the hands of the administrator after \u201c the term of seven years, shall be expire:!, and not recovered 6t by any of the kin to the deceased, or by any creditor in that u time : the same shall be paid to the church wardens and ves- \u201c try, to and for the use of the parish where the said money shall remrin.\u201d As to the administrator, the law made no disposition of the surplus to him ; and therefore it was necessary to say by this clause What should be done in such a case. The case of the administrator only is regulated by the act of 1784, ch. 25,",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Alston, Young & Co. vs. Richard Ward's executors."
  },
  "file_name": "0222-03",
  "first_page_order": 226,
  "last_page_order": 227
}