{
  "id": 11976235,
  "name": "Hamilton vs. Bullock",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hamilton v. Bullock",
  "decision_date": "1802-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "224",
  "last_page": "224",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 224"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 224"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 52,
    "char_count": 451,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.367,
    "sha256": "4b52b532221741579f21600f9772f9793af3f3922983d0aaafabc04302b946f9",
    "simhash": "1:351a30985954a95c",
    "word_count": 85
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Hamilton vs. Bullock."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "JOHNSTON, Judge.-\nThe plaintiff moves for & new trial, \" and it is objected to him, that a new trial has been before granted ; and that there cannot be a new trial after a new trial. I am of opinion there may be, and the court ought to grant a new trial, where it is evident the second verdict is against law.\nSo a new trial was granted the second time. 4 Burrow, 2108, was the case cited in confirmation of the judge\u2019s opinion,",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "JOHNSTON, Judge.-"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Hamilton vs. Bullock."
  },
  "file_name": "0224-02",
  "first_page_order": 228,
  "last_page_order": 228
}