{
  "id": 11976520,
  "name": "Sanders vs. Hamilton",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sanders v. Hamilton",
  "decision_date": "1802-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "226",
  "last_page": "227",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 226"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 226"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 62,
    "char_count": 519,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.297,
    "sha256": "1ae671f9a65b009bcca86c26cd899a8d36f20c1291c628c18cf62a18da696dc5",
    "simhash": "1:8479a0c8a1082e0c",
    "word_count": 88
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Sanders vs. Hamilton."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "1\\/fAJiSHALL, Chief Justice.\nIt is said Hamilton warranted fhfi ifconrli { the Wench fiom whom desended the slaves afterwards recovered by Streater from Sanders. The record of that recovery is new offered, to be read to prove S treater\u2019s title. I am of opinion, that as Hamilton was no. party to that suit, nor privy, is \u00bfarmot be read to prove Sweater's title : it may, however, to shey; that Sanders was evicted.\nAnd it was accordingly read for that purpose only\u00bb",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "1\\/fAJiSHALL, Chief Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Circuit Court,\nDecember, 1802.\nSanders vs. Hamilton."
  },
  "file_name": "0226-02",
  "first_page_order": 230,
  "last_page_order": 231
}