{
  "id": 11977757,
  "name": "Jones vs. Drake",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jones v. Drake",
  "decision_date": "1803-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "237",
  "last_page": "237",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 237"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 237"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 85,
    "char_count": 836,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.354,
    "sha256": "2b2aded4774e0c2c654f7b20d245227d805c15d2392f11e8db2bdc961712ce18",
    "simhash": "1:4393f67b04d4d6c8",
    "word_count": 163
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Jones vs. Drake."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Hally Judge,\ndoubted ; but applying ta Baker to know how the practice was, and he saying it was to serve the bill on the infant ciuly 5 his honor then held the guardian bound to answer, with\u00bb out being served with the bill, but gave time to answer.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Hally Judge,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "\u00cd? eonfra"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Jones vs. Drake.\n\u00a1THE defendant was an infant, and was served with the bill ia equity before the last term; and at the last term, Davis was appointed his guardian to answer and defend the suit for him,\nAnd now Mr. Plummer moved that he was not bound to answer at this term, because he had not been served with a copy m the bill.\n\u00cd? eonfra\nThe practice is to serve the bill on the defendant, and then appoint him a guardian to answer that bill. There is sao necessity to serve the guardian with a new bill. And the counsel cited 1 Harrison, 474, and Kay vs. Black\u2019s heirs, in this court."
  },
  "file_name": "0237-02",
  "first_page_order": 241,
  "last_page_order": 241
}