{
  "id": 11979725,
  "name": "Jones and wife vs. Walker and others",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jones v. Walker",
  "decision_date": "1803-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "291",
  "last_page": "292",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 291"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 291"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 255,
    "char_count": 2191,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.264,
    "sha256": "e032a50c7525548b590506d208b79168c964b093cb40cf99b303e52f3527b28b",
    "simhash": "1:f41027dac2d6c5f5",
    "word_count": 417
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Jones and wife vs. Walker and others."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER1 curiam.\nAn appeal from an inferior conrt of admiralty,. takes the cause from that court, and such court can no longer act in it s But it still retains power to take care of the goods. seized, which are the subject of- the suit ; and to that end it may order a sale of such goods as are likely to perish. What raised the greatest doubt with us tras the uncertainty whether the goods in question were sold by order of the court.The proceedings chew that nicer the appeal, the now plaintiff was order,e-d to pay for salvage,, one third in value of tlie property by a certain day, or otherwise an order of sale should issue. Then it appears that the counsel for the claimant procured a postponement of the sale till the 4*Ji of February. It appears also, by a deposition of the Marshal, that he sold by order of the court- And it appears by ocher d\u00a1c-~positions thtf\u00ed \u00edh\u00fc papers of this cov,;f cr- lapt re: 7 Go (,n dips of paper, which were o\u00ed ten \u2018A-flec-V'*d funn 0i<* MG \u2022, ;-,s applied for !>v \u00cdH\u00edUvic\u00eduab. From all:]\u2022\u2022\u2022 .> .\u2022 :h ..masf ni i-n \"\u25a0\u2022. ; L..v n concluded tbit the cvidauco in in favo\u00bb of rh.: order c7 sale. Then if the court ordered a r.slo, thore who pwcfc.w.- d unci'.r't should be protected; and the defendants &) t- iGme >.tr* \u00bfIf w j \u2022 . ,uc(l. that a\u2019l the world rre y-M-s o, pdse cause in tb,-- \u00a1'dmn'.akY ; r>.ml ere a.G\".art:! by \u00bb do no hi <::e lid\u00edate cou.) t. This should be unbfTrtuod wifh sovae rt rtt n vr.->\\ Upon the publication made oi the act. depending, in t! a: all persons Intt-reoted may come in and defend, all p< .na r.- % L'&urnl b 1 Te decree prouooMci.d upon the point thin in . , \\ .:>?,y\u00bb T 1 re ir, no c ;nusua.\u00ed:,7 betw< <-n ii,c Id \u25a0 !l \u2022 \u00a1 r dbs.-u.i.r ; ,: -j Jvo-e v, ho afterwards b< canv hiferesu\u2019d by a ;.\\l-d:?.res und.-r crtitir. and pi'c-cv due \u2022; of thi court \u00a10 :\u2022;\u2022\u2022 .\u2022\u25a0 teir.'eerj the libellant \u00absnd claimants, Guch intervenim; perec\u00ed ~ ore \"jot b itiKil by a deerr e m-'rle 5b:: libfU.-u:!1: a.sd irsauts In tb-.- \u00a1\u25a0ppilmr court. The d-dundants are enTi. d to r taio the property ?hey have pnri.hf.eed, :.J though ;Su; dccrcu or ths appellate ,u\u00fci i declared to belong to the claimant\u00bb",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER1 curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Jones and wife vs. Walker and others."
  },
  "file_name": "0291-03",
  "first_page_order": 295,
  "last_page_order": 296
}