{
  "id": 11981502,
  "name": "Anonymous",
  "name_abbreviation": "Anonymous",
  "decision_date": "1804-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "327",
  "last_page": "327",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 327"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 327"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 134,
    "char_count": 1087,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.211,
    "sha256": "914bc43980fe3ea67421c37f7b082fd77f803311d75ee47ea7863a789e5d2364",
    "simhash": "1:80f35257fbd60d39",
    "word_count": 207
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Anonymous."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Hall, Judge,\nsaid lie had long doubted exceedingly of that \u00bfei.kion; but as it had been decided by the Couit A Confer\u00bb \u00abnce, he would not undertake to over-rule it- \u2014 but it a proper case was made, would cairy it to the Ccuit of Conference loir their rc-consideration. Most clearly, if the delivery was made So the plaintiff by the ictciveuing person t* whom it %?\u00ab\u00bb delivered for the plaintiff\u2019s benefit, before the tem* were \u00abimplied with in which the delivery to hi in v at atsthc.riiitd by the defendant, it wa\u00bb do\u00bbe without authority, ved ccwlt i.#*, bis \u00abbestdared ns, hi# delivery, #i\u201ed to r.ci Iff* bend.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Hall, Judge,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Edenton,\nOctober Term, 1804.\nAnonymous.\nTVSIST rpcn a bond, and u\u00abn estfactum pleaded. The plain\u00bb tiff proved the delivery of the bond, and was proceeding to state che conditions on which it tras delivered, to be dele vi\u00bb cd over.\nMr. Drew insisted, that as there was no plea of delivered as mn escrow, no such proof could be offered , and relied upon iha case decided by Judge TayAr at Ncwbern, and afterwaids fey the Court of Conference j the case of Smallwood vs. Clark."
  },
  "file_name": "0327-02",
  "first_page_order": 331,
  "last_page_order": 331
}