{
  "id": 11982071,
  "name": "Wilking's vs. M'Kenzie",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wilking's v. M'Kenzie",
  "decision_date": "1804-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "333",
  "last_page": "333",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 333"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 333"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 76,
    "char_count": 639,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.495,
    "sha256": "30f4c3d9e1d3ebd7c4d7b4a46d98da2011fa08ca5bb414cb19a3b999eb6209ca",
    "simhash": "1:08e4a1a2988c171e",
    "word_count": 112
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Wilking's vs. M\u2018Kenzie."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "KpHIS cause again came on to be tried before Judge Taylor, -*\u25a0 and the same evidence was given as on the former trial, except this addition, that M\u2018Kenzie being about to leave town, Wilkings said to him, how shall I get your endorsementf M\u2018Ken-sie answered, I will leave an order which will secure you. The Judge left it to the jury to determine whether this evidence proved an agreement on the part of M\u00a3Eensie, to indemnify the plaintiff in case of a non acceptance of the bill. If they thought it was, then a verdict should be found for the plaintiff; if otherwise, for the defendant,\nVerdict for the plaintiff.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Wilking's vs. M\u2018Kenzie."
  },
  "file_name": "0333-01",
  "first_page_order": 337,
  "last_page_order": 337
}