{
  "id": 11983827,
  "name": "Dunlop & Co. vs. West, the Marshal",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dunlop v. West",
  "decision_date": "1805-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "346",
  "last_page": "346",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 346"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 346"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 46,
    "char_count": 330,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.415,
    "sha256": "273cbaec4ebdd8ac0e6e635174f26c24766f77550f8ee1ee59689fb5a09a55ab",
    "simhash": "1:dfed2906174a29c0",
    "word_count": 56
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Dunlop & Co. vs. West, the Marshal."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "\u2018jpER Curiam.\nIf the Sheriff or Marshal seizes property in execution, and neglects to se\u00edl\u00edt, and is sued for his neglect, the plaintiff shall recover damages, to the amount of what the property would have produced, had he sold it.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "\u2018jpER Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Circuit Court of the United States.\nRaleigh,\nJune Term, 1805.\nDunlop & Co. vs. West, the Marshal."
  },
  "file_name": "0346-02",
  "first_page_order": 350,
  "last_page_order": 350
}