{
  "id": 11984168,
  "name": "Brady vs. Ellison",
  "name_abbreviation": "Brady v. Ellison",
  "decision_date": "1805-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "348",
  "last_page": "348",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 348"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 348"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 120,
    "char_count": 1382,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.364,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.1745777929606851e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7716079199984246
    },
    "sha256": "f43547a125a83c4a22becaafe0bee87bc3c0dda420f3f960add59d13adc7da2a",
    "simhash": "1:13be856759eff2ae",
    "word_count": 226
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Brady vs. Ellison."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per curiam.\nVi Worsley was a creditor, the conveyance intended, to defeat him, was a fraudulent conveyance ;\u2022 and an as-sumpsit By Ellison to restore the lands, was'void. The act o-f Assembly says, the contract shall be valid between the debtor and his-grantee ;\u2022 and1 why? \u2014 To deter the debtor from the attempt,, by placing him in- the power of the grantee.. This, obstacle to the attempt would be completely removed, if the plaintiff could- legally bind himself to restore the property or its value, and the debtor could practise a fraud on his creditors without the least risque : for after he had succeeded in defraudr. ing his creditors, the law would interefere in his favor, and en-, force the returning of his property by the vendee.\nIf Worsley, however, was not a creditor, then the conveyance-is not fraudulent \u2014 and there is no legal objection.to the contract^ w.bi,ch the plaintiff has sued o'\nYerdict for- the plaintiff\u00bb,",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Brady vs. Ellison.\nBRADY was- sued by Worsley, and was'apprehensive of a-, recovery: EUison represented to him that the plaintiff was likely to recover \u2014 and that Brady and Ellison agreed that Brady shouid convey to Ellison his land* rvhich Ellison should re-convey, if Worsley should! not obtain judgment;-but if he-should, that then he should convey- to, Erady\u2019s children. \u2014 \u25a0. Worsley was non-suited, and Ellison refused to recover the land.."
  },
  "file_name": "0348-01",
  "first_page_order": 352,
  "last_page_order": 352
}