{
  "id": 11986467,
  "name": "King and wife vs. Worsley and others",
  "name_abbreviation": "King v. Worsley",
  "decision_date": "1805-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "366",
  "last_page": "366",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Hayw. 366"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 N.C. 366"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Super. Ct.",
    "id": 22358,
    "name": "North Carolina Superior Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 61,
    "char_count": 517,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.285,
    "sha256": "d2e2a3abed1b455b97b12f0eb605f76189af4df24f8787c7412297188bf2f3d2",
    "simhash": "1:7e7cfaecb09de612",
    "word_count": 89
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:25:52.833864+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "King and wife vs. Worsley and others."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Locke, Judge,\nalter argument. The advancement jnu^t be es--tii-ais4 according to the value when advanceed*",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Locke, Judge,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "King and wife vs. Worsley and others.\nHP HE plaintiff\u2019s wife, whilst a widow, dissented to her former husband\u2019s will, and now sued for a child\u2019s part: and the question was, as to an advancement made to one of the children, whether that should be estimated according to the present value, ot as was the value when advanced. Tin* advancement consisted ul a wench and one child, but there are now seven children."
  },
  "file_name": "0366-01",
  "first_page_order": 370,
  "last_page_order": 370
}